4 posts tagged “islam”
In the James Bond novel "Dr No," Ian Fleming's character Dr. No said "once is coincidence, twice is happenstance, but three times is enemy action." He was referring to the recurrence of similar actions over a period of time involving the same people, specifically the fact that Agent 007 kept showing up in his neighborhood.
There is terrorism we can see, smell and fear, but there is a new kind of terror invading The United States in the form of Sharia law and finance. Condoning it is civilization suicide. Middle East Muslims are coming to America in record numbers and building hate infidel mosques, buying our corporations, suing us for our traditions, but they and the whole subject of Islam is white noise leaving uninformed Americans about who and what is really peaceful.
Where is our investigative press?
Any criticism of Islam or their intentions, even though Islamic leaders state their intentions daily around the globe, brings-forth a volley of 'racist' from the left-wing Democrat crowd. Lies and deception behind a master plan - the ingredients for 'The Manchurian Candidate' or the placement of an anti-American President in our nation's White House?
Is it mere coincidence that an anti-capitalist runs for President at the same time Islamic sharia finance and law is trying to make advancing strides into the United States? Is it mere coincidence this same candidate wants to dis-arm our nuclear capability at a time when terrorist Muslim nations are expanding their nuclear weapons capability? Is it mere coincidence this candidate wants to reduce our military at a time of global jihad from Muslim nations?
Change for America? What change? To become another 'Nation of Islam'?
Keeping this to yourself does NOT get the word out to those who need to read it.
For THOSE to take over is for us to do NOTHING!!
The rest of this is posted at my blogspot site. You should go read the whole thing.
Appeasement is the name given to what Neville Chamberlain did at Munich in September 1938. Rather than fight Germany in another great war -- to keep 3.5 million Germans under a Czech rule they despised -- he agreed to their peaceful transfer to German rule. With these Germans went the lands their ancestors had lived upon for centuries, German Bohemia, or the Sudetenland.
Chamberlain's negotiated deal with Hitler averted a European war -- at the expense of the Czech nation. That was appeasement.
So writes Pat Buchanan in his weekly column distributed by Human Events via email today.
Before I get started on this piece of BS, I want to state that at one time I actually liked Pat Buchanan. I thought his concept of "economic patriotism", (only buying goods made in the USA or it's allies), was a good one. This was back when the Klintoons were embroiled in the China/Huang/Trie money scandal and I was actually worried that this country was being sold down the Yalu River.
Now, I'm calling bulls**t on this column he wrote. Buchanan states that Chamberlain's negotiating with Hitler averted a Europoean war. Bravo Sierra. War was NOT averted, it was delayed for one year, at the expense of the Czech nation. Hiler got what he wanted becasue he lied at the negotiating table. This is the best example of why we don't negotiate with whackjobs, zealots, or religious fanatics. They LIE!!!!
Hiltler knew Chamberlain was a pu**y. Churchill knew Hitler was lying. Knew that Hitler would not abide by the terms of the agreement. Churchill said this regarding appeasement of fanatics, and I use it every day, "Those who insist we can just feed the alligator will be eaten last." Feeding the alligator to keep it happy only makes the alligator stronger and gives the feeder a false sense of security. The alligator will eat the feeder when there is nothing more to eat.
Monkey Boy Imeanajihad is the alligator and so is radical islam and the whackjobs who follow its precepts.
The last thing we need to do is feed them and let them get stronger.
Buchanan has actually given the best example of why not to negotiate.
From our friends at Family Security Matters
Very long but very educational
Islamofascism? Hitler, Muhammad, and Islam
Part One of Two
Andrew G.Bostom
Cliff May deserves credit for his recent National Review Online column “The New True Believers.” May dares to associate – however indirectly, and in the end, I am afraid, inadequately – those he terms, using layers of prophylactic rhetorical separation from orthodox Islam, either “militant jihadists,” or “Islamists,” and their movement as “militant Islamism,” – with Hitler, and his “movement,” i.e., Nazism.
May’s inchoate effort should be applauded for its attempted illustration of any possible ideological nexus between Hitler’s Nazism and Islam. But ultimately, the associations he makes – the “ability to nurse grievances and stoke ambitions,” Germans/Aryans as a master race, and the concordant supremacism of “militant Islamism,” and, invoking Eric Hoffer’s “The True Believer,” generic “fanaticism” – ignore much more intimate, if uncomfortable to acknowledge, doctrinal and historical connections between ancient Islam and modern Nazism, upon which I will elaborate.
Diana West has summarized how the prevailing usage of the term “Islamofascism” obfuscates critically relevant truths:
“Islamofascism” is a made-up word that draws a politically correct curtain over mainstream, traditional Islam, in effect shielding the religion and its tenets from scrutiny when considering what drives our jihadist enemies – as they are the first to declare.
My discussion introduces a doctrinally and historically relevant context if the currently much abused term “Islamofascism” is to be understood and employed appropriately, acknowledging the direct nexus between Islam, pre-modern despotism, and modern totalitarian ideologies.
Islam, Nazism, and Totalitarianism
During an interview conducted in the late 1930s (published in 1939), Carl Jung, the Swiss psychiatrist and founder of analytical psychiatry, was asked “…had he any views on what was likely to be the next step in religious development?” Jung replied, in reference to the Nazi fervor that had gripped Germany,
We do not know whether Hitler is going to found a new Islam. He is already on the way; he is like Muhammad. The emotion in Germany is Islamic; warlike and Islamic. They are all drunk with wild god. That can be the historic future.
Albert Speer, who was Hitler’s Minister of Armaments and War Production, wrote a contrite memoir of his World War II experiences while serving a 20-year prison sentence imposed by the Nuremberg tribunal. Speer’s narrative includes this discussion, which captures Hitler’s racist views of Arabs on the one hand, and his effusive praise for Islam on the other:
Hitler had been much impressed by a scrap of history he had learned from a delegation of distinguished Arabs. When the Mohammedans attempted to penetrate beyond France into Central Europe during the eighth century, his visitors had told him, they had been driven back at the Battle of Tours. Had the Arabs won this battle, the world would be Mohammedan today. For theirs was a religion that believed in spreading the faith by the sword and subjugating all nations to that faith. Such a creed was perfectly suited to the Germanic temperament. Hitler said that the conquering Arabs, because of their racial inferiority, would in the long run have been unable to contend with the harsher climate and conditions of the country. They could not have kept down the more vigorous natives, so that ultimately not Arabs but Islamized Germans could have stood at the head of this Mohammedan Empire. Hitler usually concluded this historical speculation by remarking, “You see, it’s been our misfortune to have the wrong religion. Why didn’t we have the religion of the Japanese, who regard sacrifice for the Fatherland as the highest good? The Mohammedan religion too would have been much more compatible to us than Christianity. Why did it have to be Christianity with its meekness and flabbiness?”
Joint meeting of the Flight 93 Memorial Task Force and the Flight 93 Federal Advisory Commission
The Courthouse - Somerset, PA February 2, 2008 Good afternoon Ladies and Gentlemen, My name is Bill Steiner. I live in Mt. Pleasant, PA I come to Somerset today with the same deep respect and heavy heart that my wife and I carried here over 2 ½ years ago on Sunday July 31, 2005 when we came to see the five finalists in the Flight 93 Memorial design competition. We came with eager anticipation to experience each of the designs, knowing one of them would carry a most important final tribute forever into time and into the minds and hearts of all Americans. After only a few minutes in the display room, it was abundantly and unequivocally clear that the most well done design was horribly flawed with Islamic symbolism. We were truly dumbstruck that the main feature was a huge perfectly shaped Red Islamic Crescent and was called the “Crescent of Embrace”. We knew for certain that those two features alone were enough to cruelly taint this design and to make grossly inappropriate. My wife knew the “Crescent of Embrace” would be chosen as the winner because it was by far the most esthetically pleasing and was the most well done. After dropping a disapproving comment in the suggestion box, we came home and did our best to urgently sound the alarm to everyone we possibly could. Our mission was urgent, the choice was about to be made. Unfortunately, we find it necessary to come again today with the very same warning... that nothing substantive has been changed, except for a different name and with a few trees added to make the Crescent look like a circle. We find only cosmetic changes...a disguise...an alias and a beard. It is the same design we found in July 2005. While nothing much has been changed, much, much more has been found...noting the extensively documented discoveries and claims of my collaborator, Alec Rawls. Everyone in this room is familiar with this controversy. We are certainly not alone in our expressions of concern and dismay for what this design contains. Representative Tom Tancredo and family member Tom Burnett, Sr. have been very outspoken in calling for the design to be scrapped and another chosen. We certainly agree and so do many, many others. Thousands and thousands of our citizens are now fully aware that our claims have merit. Well over 95% of those with whom I share the design easily comprehend the inappropriate content and cannot understand why you would allow it to remain. Most all strongly ask, “Who is responsible for this design?” There is simply just too much of an obviously questionable nature contained in the Murdoch design to let it stand unchallenged. It must be fully, publicly, and most of all, independently, vetted. We are requesting an open, honest, properly constituted congressional investigation of what we have found. The victims of Flight 93 and their families deserve to have the air cleared so they can rest. The American people deserve to know completely the nature of what they are purchasing here as a memorial to this horrific tragedy and dastardly act of war. It must be a proper and fitting one with no hint or suggestion of anything Islamic involved, whatsoever. Please consider the consequences of allowing this flawed design to pass into our history and into perpetuity. We ask you to let the light shine in. Please let the American people know the details. Please let them decide. Thank you very much. End public comments. The simplest possible rationale for the above...
We find: Can all this be coincidental? The odds are certainly against it! Therefore, we conclude that... The Chosen Flight 93 Memorial Design is a Fraud Bill Steiner Mt. Pleasant, PA 724-547-7107 Cell 412-582-0644 n3auj@zoominternet.net Please help us. Please call, write or email now. Calls & faxes work best! Link to the General Assembly -- http://www.legis.state.pa.us/index.cfm Link to the Senate page -- http://www.pasen.gov/index.cfm Link to the House page -- http://www.house.state.pa.us/index.cfm
